News

Intel's new CEO Lip Bu Tan plots turnaround: spinoffs, AI focus, and humanoid robotics

Apr 1, 2025

Key Points

  • Intel's Foundry business lost $13.4 billion last year while the company's revenue has shrunk 33% over four years, forcing new CEO Lip Bu Tan to outline a turnaround plan centered on AI chips, external manufacturing, and potential spinoffs.
  • Intel generates less than $500,000 in revenue per employee versus Nvidia's $3.55 million, exposing a productivity crisis rooted in decades of monopoly that persists despite cutting 13% of its workforce.
  • Tan's early strategy stays within Intel's existing playbook rather than executing the kind of radical structural pivot that Andy Grove performed in the 1980s, leaving unclear whether he will pursue manufacturing-design separation or find a bolder answer.

Summary

Lip Bu Tan took over as Intel's CEO on March 18. Two weeks into the role, he faces a company in structural decline. Intel's annual revenue has shrunk 33% over four years, the company has burned cash since 2022, and its Foundry business lost $13.4 billion last year. The stock is down 60% over five years.

At Intel Vision in Las Vegas, Tan signaled continuity with predecessor Pat Gelsinger's strategy around AI chip competitiveness and building the Foundry business to manufacture chips designed by external customers. He also hinted at structural change through spinoffs of non-core businesses and cost reduction. Intel cut 13% of its workforce last year but still employs far more people than any competitor in semiconductors.

The productivity gap is stark. Intel generates less than $500,000 in annual revenue per employee. Nvidia generates $3.55 million per employee. That gap reflects Intel's inability to translate headcount into output, a legacy problem rooted in decades of near-monopoly in PC chips that fostered an arrogant corporate culture.

Tan has not yet articulated a decisive strategic pivot. Andy Grove, Intel's storied former chief, abandoned the company's unprofitable memory-chip business in the 1980s when Japanese competitors rendered it economically unviable, pivoting the entire company toward personal computer processors. The AI wave presents a similar inflection point. Tan's public statements so far stay within the existing playbook: better AI chips, stronger Foundry, humanoid robotics R&D. Whether that represents genuine conviction or a holding pattern while he consolidates control remains unclear.

Investors have welcomed Tan's appointment, sending Intel's stock up 10% since mid-March. Some analysts argue Intel should split manufacturing from design and marketing, a structure that has worked for TSMC and Nvidia, and potentially bring in outside capital for the Foundry. Intel is already in talks about such partnerships. The core question is whether Tan will execute a variation on that theme or find a more radical answer.