Interview

Chariot Defense launches from stealth: high-voltage battlefield power systems for the next generation of military drones and directed energy weapons

Jul 16, 2025 with Adam Warmoth

Key Points

  • Chariot Defense launches from stealth with $8M seed funding to build high-voltage power systems for military drones and directed energy weapons, filling a 30-50 kilowatt battlefield power gap that diesel generators cannot safely meet.
  • Within six months of first funding, Chariot had equipment at JRTC powering lasers and electronic warfare systems, with founder Adam briefing the Army Chief of Staff on operational deployment.
  • Adam warns that battery pack assembly certified to DoD standards is the missing domestic capability, pointing to A123 Systems' failure as precedent for how U.S. technology leadership in lithium batteries migrated to Chinese dominance via CATL.
Chariot Defense launches from stealth: high-voltage battlefield power systems for the next generation of military drones and directed energy weapons

Summary

Chariot Defense emerged from stealth at the Reindustrialize conference in Detroit on July 16, 2025, announcing a seed round from General Catalyst and XYZ Venture Capital. The company, founded in fall 2024 by Adam (previously counter-UAS program manager at Androll and head of product at Archer Aviation, with prior stints at Uber Elevate and Kittyhawk), builds high-voltage power systems for expeditionary military environments.

The Problem

The core market gap is what Chariot frames as a battlefield power deficit in the 30 to 50 kilowatt range. Existing military platforms cannot output that level of power, yet next-generation directed energy systems from companies like Eperis and Aurelius require it to operate at the edge. The legacy alternative, diesel generators, is increasingly untenable: in Ukraine, units avoid running generators within 30 kilometers of the front line because the thermal and acoustic signature makes them immediate drone targets.

Battery-based systems reduce that signature materially. Because batteries carry no exhaust and produce significantly lower EMI than the spinning-magnet architecture of a diesel generator, they can be shielded and concealed more effectively. Chariot also points to a software layer problem: today's forward operating positions have no intelligent power management, meaning a soldier plugging in a coffee maker can brown out an air defense radar.

Product and Traction

Chariot's sweet spot is purpose-built high-voltage hybrid power systems that can bolt onto existing military vehicles or integrate into new OEM platforms, effectively converting them into mobile power stations. The product stack covers energy storage, power conversion electronics, and a control layer that actively manages load priority at the edge.

Within three months of its first funding check, Chariot had equipment at a live military exercise powering lasers and electronic warfare systems. Within six months, the company was at JRTC (Joint Readiness Training Center), where founder Adam briefed Dr. Alex Miller and General George, Chief of Staff of the Army.

Business Model and Go-to-Market

Chariot describes itself as defense-first but dual-use, targeting three parallel channels: direct government sales, OEM integration partnerships, and sales alongside complementary capability providers such as laser or electronic warfare firms. The company positions DoD as the anchor customer willing to pay a premium for U.S.-sourced materials and ruggedized certification standards, with disaster relief, oil and gas, and mining as subsequent expansion verticals once early government contracts are secured.

On supply chain, Adam argues Chariot can serve as a demand aggregator for domestic battery material producers. DoD will not buy refined lithium directly, but it will buy a fielded capability, allowing Chariot to absorb U.S.-sourced lithium into certified packs and effectively subsidize the early cost curve for domestic suppliers.

The Broader Supply Chain Warning

Adam identifies battery cell manufacturing and battery pack assembly as the most underappreciated vulnerabilities in U.S. defense industrial capacity. He traces the current Chinese dominance in lithium iron phosphate batteries directly to A123 Systems, a U.S.-incubated company that received significant government investment, mistimed the market, ran out of cash, and was acquired and licensed to China, where the technology became the foundation for CATL. He draws a parallel to consumer drones, where U.S. pioneers including 3DR and Chris Anderson ceded the market to DJI. Pack manufacturing certified to DoD standards is the specific capability he flags as currently lacking domestic scale.