Former CIA spy master and congressman Will Hurd on CHAOS Industries' radar technology, drone threats, and Golden Dome
Sep 19, 2025 with Will Hurd
Key Points
- CHAOS Industries received $2 million from the U.S. Air Force and $10 million from the House defense appropriations bill to deploy its Astria radar system at Eglin Air Force Base.
- The company's distributed radar synchronizes nodes to picosecond precision, allowing simultaneous tracking of high-altitude and low-altitude threats that conventional systems miss.
- Will Hurd argues the federal government's year-to-year budget cycle is incompatible with long-term defense planning and procurement, undermining competitiveness against China's strategic technology roadmap.
Summary
Will Hurd, chief strategy officer at CHAOS Industries, former CIA case officer, and former U.S. congressman, makes the case that the most urgent near-term military threat is not nuclear ICBMs but low-altitude, low-cost autonomous systems — subsonic cruise missiles and drones flying under 50,000 feet. He frames Golden Dome as strategically necessary but strategically misaligned with the immediate threat environment, where a $20,000 drone can neutralize a $1 billion piece of infrastructure.
CHAOS Industries and Its Technology
CHAOS has developed what it calls coherent distributed multi-static radar, synchronizing multiple nodes to the picosecond — a timing precision Hurd contextualizes as the equivalent of one second relative to 32,000 years. That synchronization allows the system to simultaneously track high-altitude, long-range objects and low-altitude, small, nearby threats, closing the radar gap that makes "flying below the radar" viable in conventional systems.
The company has two primary hardware products. Vanquish is a man-portable expeditionary system that deploys in roughly 15 minutes, fits on an ATV, and is designed for austere environments. Astria is a larger fixed system currently being deployed at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, backed by a $2 million U.S. Air Force contract and a separate $10 million line item in the House defense appropriations bill.
Hurd says CHAOS has approximately $500 million in total capital raised, which he argues gives the company runway to survive the long and unpredictable government procurement cycles that constrain smaller defense startups.
Combat Validation and Geopolitical Positioning
Hurd positions Ukraine as the mandatory proving ground for any serious defense tech company. CHAOS has been tested there against Russian electronic warfare systems and has been invited to return. The company was also deployed during what he calls the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, where it tracked Shahed drones moving between the two countries. He describes the First Island Chain — a potential U.S.-China conflict theater — as significantly more challenging than Ukraine, making that combat track record essential for credibility.
Integration with the broader kill chain is explicit company strategy. CHAOS has already demonstrated interoperability with Anduril and maintains relationships with Palantir dating to Hurd's congressional tenure, when he was advocating for a technology-driven smart border and received an early call from Palmer Luckey.
Counter-Narcotics and Border Applications
Mexican drug cartels generate an estimated $60 billion annually — equal to the entire U.S. intelligence community budget — and are actively deploying drone tactics adapted from the Ukraine conflict. Border Patrol testified before the Senate that a single border sector recorded approximately 41,000 drone sightings in a recent reporting period. CHAOS is in early conversations with border authorities about applying its radar capability there, though Hurd declined to detail specifics.
Structural Critique of Defense Procurement
Hurd argues the federal government's year-to-year appropriations model is incompatible with running a multi-hundred-billion-dollar national security enterprise. He advocates for a minimum two-year budget and appropriations cycle to give defense contractors and military planners the planning horizon that any comparably scaled private enterprise would require. China's strategic framework — targeting mastery of 15 to 17 critical technologies including AI, hypersonics, and autonomous systems, with a goal of making every six-year-old AI-conversant by 2030 — is the direct competitive pressure that makes procurement reform urgent, in his view. Over a third of global 5G infrastructure is already built on Chinese technology, a data point he cites as evidence the competition is not theoretical.